A lthough Paul does not
directly address the question of the personality of the Holy Spirit, several
matching data give us the certainty that the apostle understood the Holy Spirit
in personal terms; closely related to the Father and the Son and
yet different from them.
First, we must recognize that the most frequent
mentions of the Holy Spirit, allude to Him in terms of action (it is true to
the Holy Spirit, allude to Him in terms of action (that is, the Spirit is the
agent of the activity of God.) It is also true that this language does not
necessarily imply personality. However, a still superficial reading of the
passages in which Paul refers to the Spirit (or Holy Spirit) shows how often
the action finds a personal expression. " For example, the conversion of
the Thessalonians is produced by the sanctifying work of the
Spirit (2 Thess 2:13; d. 1 Cor 6:11; Rom 15:16), and the same also happens with
the joy that accompanies it (1 Thess 1: 6 d. Rom 15:13) Revelation comes from
the Spirit (1 Cor 2:10; Eph.3: 5); and Paul's
preaching is accompanied by the power of the Spirit (I Thess 1: 5). Prophetic
and tongues are the direct result of speaking by the Spirit (1 Cor 12: 3; 14:
2, 16). The Romans are to die every sinful practice through the Spirit
(Rom 8:13). Paul expresses his desire that the Ephesians be strengthened
by the Spirit of God ( Eph. 3:16). Believers serve by the
Spirit (Phil. 3: 3), love by the Spirit (Col. 1: 8), are sealed by the
Spirit ( Eph. 1:13), and walk and live by the Spirit (Gal. 5: 16,
25). Finally, believers are saved "by washing by the Holy Spirit whom
God poured on them" (Titus 3: 5).
On the one hand, a passage such as the latter may suggest action
brings to mind the idea of personality, nor does the imagery of
"washing" by the Spirit. On the other hand, if we analyze them
carefully, most of these passages imply or presuppose the personality of the
Holy Spirit, and that the terminology of the outpouring is simply imagery. This
is especially evident in passages such as 1 Corinthians 6:11 in which God
"washes, sanctifies and justifies" through the double action of
the "name [authority] of the Lord Jesus Christ" and "the Spirit
of our God."
The argument is that, what Paul says of the Spirit in terms of
action, is analogous to what he affirms in many texts about Christ. The
implication is evident: it is difficult to observe the great shortage of
impersonal images that Paul uses in his letters. E n contrast to
Lucas, rarely speaks the apostle of being filled with the Spirit; their primary
language alludes to God who "puts his E spíritu within
you." "or" receiving "or" have "~ spíritu.24 None
of these images involves personality, but also suggest the impersonal, like so
many other images ( wind, fire, etc.).
And I made that Paul understands the Spirit as a person is
confirmed, secondly, by the fact that the E spíritu is the subject
of a lot of verbs that require a personal agent. The Spirit searches
all things (1 Cor 2:10), knows the mind of the Lord (1 Cor 2:11), teaches the
content of the Gospel to believers (1 Cor 2:13), dwells among
believers or within of them (1 Cor 3:16; Rom 8:11; 2 Tim 1:14), do all these
things (1 Cor 12:11), give life to those who believe (2 Cor 3: 6), cry out in
our hearts (Gal 4: 6), guides us in the ways of the Lord (Gal 5:18; Rom 8:14),
testifies to our spirit (Rom 8:16), has desires that oppose the flesh (Gal 5 :
17), helps us in our weakness (Rom 8:26), intercedes for us (Rom 8: 26-27),
makes all things cooperate for our good (Rom 8:28), 25 strengthens believers (
~ f 3:16), and be sad with our sin (Eph. 4:30). Moreover, the
fruit of the abode of the E spíritu are the personal attributes of
God (Gal 5: 22-23).
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario